Did the Celtics beat the Kings because they were better without Jayson Tatum?
Without Jayson Tatum, the ball handlers for the Celtics put up one of their most aggressive offensive performances of the year. Will it happen again when he gets back?
In a highly competitive first quarter, Domantas Sabonis engaged in a physical encounter with Kristaps Porziņģis, eliciting an elbow that left the Celtics’ center bleeding. Despite the incident, Porziņģis continued to play, contributing to a fast-paced game where both teams made a combined 19 three-pointers. The Celtics, sans Jayson Tatum, showcased balanced offensive prowess, generating 35 assists and creating a potential 100-possession pace. Coach Joe Mazzulla praised the team’s poise and perspective, emphasizing their ability to play at their preferred pace and control the game defensively. Porziņģis’ return proved pivotal as he exploited mismatches, drawing fouls and securing free throws, significantly impacting the Celtics’ lead.
The Celtics demonstrated comfort playing at a faster pace, contrasting with their recent slow-down against Golden State. Mazzulla highlighted the team’s ability to win in different ways, emphasizing the benefits of playing at a higher tempo. The game’s outcome showcased the Celtics’ effective pick-and-roll attack, with Derrick White and Jaylen Brown excelling in those sets. Mazzulla credited defensive adjustments and praised the team’s improved offensive execution, pointing to White as a key playmaker. Despite the success of the alternative play style, the Celtics remain adaptable, capable of employing a more methodical approach through Tatum’s offensive gravity. The victory against Sacramento emphasized the team’s intentional play in the early shot clock seconds, maximizing advantages and making effective reads for a more rhythmic offense.