Last week, On3 published its subjective rankings of Big Ten coaches, with Ryan Day of Ohio State topping the list. However, these rankings have sparked discussion, particularly concerning Sherrone Moore, the Michigan head coach, who appears to be undervalued.
While Moore’s lack of head coaching experience may be a factor, the criteria used in the rankings prioritize aspects such as hiring assistants, producing NFL Draft picks, wins, working the transfer portal, and recruiting.
However, let’s hypothetically elevate Moore’s ranking based on certain factors. For instance, if Michigan were to face teams led by Matt Rhule, Luke Fickell, and Kirk Ferentz in 2024, Moore might secure victories, prompting his rise in the rankings.
Additionally, Moore’s relatively easier rebuilding task in Ann Arbor compared to Jonathan Smith’s situation at Michigan State could warrant a higher placement for Moore.
Adjusting for these considerations, Moore lands at No. 5 in the rankings, trailing Penn State’s James Franklin, Oregon’s Dan Lanning, USC’s Lincoln Riley, and Ohio State’s Ryan Day.
When assessing Moore’s performance in terms of hiring assistants, producing NFL Draft picks, and wins, it becomes evident that he holds advantages over certain coaches ranked above him.
Notably, Moore boasts a significant road win against James Franklin’s Penn State team and has overseen the development of highly successful offensive linemen, contributing to Michigan’s accolades in the Joe Moore Award.
Despite Lincoln Riley’s success with quarterbacks, Moore’s potential at Michigan and USC’s underperformance last season suggest Moore could be positioned ahead of Riley. Furthermore, Moore’s recent victory over Ryan Day’s Ohio State team and his ability to maintain roster talent amid coaching changes make a compelling case for his higher ranking.
Considering these factors, Moore’s placement at No. 5 in the revised rankings underscores his contributions to Michigan’s program and his potential for further success in the Big Ten.
While he may lack experience as a head coach, Moore’s performance in key areas and his efforts in recruiting and coaching warrant recognition beyond his initial ranking of No. 9.
